# Social Media Impact on Judges in India

Social media has become a ubiquitous part of our lives, influencing the way we communicate, share information, and make decisions. It has also transformed the legal profession and the judiciary, offering unprecedented opportunities and challenges for judges and lawyers in India.

## Opportunities

Social media can be a great educational forum for judges to update their skills, gain knowledge, and open their minds to the wonders of the world. It can also help them stay connected with the community they serve and understand their needs and expectations. Social media can also be a platform for judges to express their views on legal issues, promote judicial reforms, and enhance public trust and confidence in the judiciary.

For example, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, a judge of the Supreme Court of India, has been active on Twitter and has shared his opinions on various topics such as constitutional values, human rights, gender justice, and environmental law. He has also participated in online events and webinars to interact with lawyers, students, and civil society groups.

## Challenges

However, social media also poses significant risks and challenges for judges, especially in terms of maintaining their integrity, impartiality, independence, and dignity. Judges have to be extra vigilant and exercise selective restraint while using social media, as they are bound by ethical codes of conduct and judicial norms.

Some of the challenges that judges face while using social media are:

- Exposure to public remarks and sentiment towards a case before trial can have an effect on judges' decision-making process. Judges have to be careful about what information they receive and by whom, and avoid being influenced by external factors or biases.

- Judges also have to be careful about how they are perceived on social media by the public, the media, the litigants, and their peers. Judges have to avoid any appearance of impropriety or conflict of interest that may undermine their credibility or authority.

- Judges also have to be mindful of the potential consequences of their social media posts or comments on their personal or professional lives. Judges have to respect the confidentiality and privacy of their cases, colleagues, litigants, and witnesses. They also have to refrain from making any inappropriate or offensive remarks that may harm their reputation or dignity.

- Judges also have to be aware of the legal implications of their social media use, such as contempt of court, defamation, breach of privilege, or violation of fundamental rights. Judges have to abide by the law and the constitution while expressing their views or opinions on social media.

## Some examples of social media impact on judges are:

- In India, some senior advocates have been accused of writing articles or making comments on social media that raise doubts about the Supreme Court’s efficacy or independence, especially in sensitive or high-profile cases. This can potentially influence or malign the judges who are hearing those cases. 

-  In the United Kingdom, a judge was reprimanded for posting comments on his personal blog that criticised the government, the legal aid system and some of his colleagues. The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office found that his comments were incompatible with his judicial role and damaged public confidence in the judiciary.

- In Australia, a juror was fined for contempt of court for posting comments on Facebook about a trial he was serving on. The judge found that his comments were prejudicial to the administration of justice and could have influenced other jurors or the public.

## Can a judge be disqualified from hearing a case due to social media activity?

Yes, a judge can be disqualified from hearing a case due to their social media activity, if it violates the ethical rules or principles that govern the judicial conduct. For example, a judge can be disqualified if their social media activity:

- Shows bias or prejudice in favour of or against a party, a lawyer, a witness or an issue involved in the case.

- Reveals personal knowledge or information about the case that is not part of the public record.

- Creates an appearance of impropriety or undermines public confidence in the judiciary.

- Interferes with the fair administration of justice or the dignity of the judicial office.

## Conclusion

Social media is a double-edged sword for judges in India. It can be a useful tool for enhancing their knowledge, skills, and outreach, but it can also be a source of trouble and controversy for them. Judges have to balance their rights and responsibilities while using social media and adhere to the principles of judicial ethics and conduct. They have to be cautious, prudent, and respectful while engaging with social media platforms.

 

Legal Aid and Advice. Click here to read the article